- Issue created by @smustgrave
- Merge request !12887Issue #3539330 by smustgrave: Remove default field config now that we don't... β (Closed) created by smustgrave
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Seems only failure in StatusTest which is known broken on head.
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Did we need a follow up for node too after automatic body creation was removed.
- π¦πΊAustralia acbramley
Seems to be a non random test failure.
I'm also not sure why we need to do this? These changes would the basic block in standard and the basic_block_type recipe basically useless (it will have no fields). We didn't remove the body field from article or page content types for Node and I don't think we should.
We should change them from text_with_summary though
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Thatβs fair Iβll leave assigned to me and convert those config instead
- Merge request !12963Issue #3539330 by smustgrave, acbramley: Remove default field config now that... β (Open) created by smustgrave
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
This actually becomes postponed now as we would have to change the storage which if we do we should just remove like we are for node.
- π¬π§United Kingdom catch
Yes this makes sense, once we deprecate the default storage, we can keep it as-is through the deprecation process and remove it, without actually having to change it. Hopefully it all works out, this is one of the hardest things we've tried to deprecate relative to how difficult you would think it would be given it's just one piece of default config.