- Issue created by @jdleonard
- πΊπΈUnited States bluegeek9
I am not sure this is a good idea.
With the User integration, we will want to ensure the user's email is of fo the contact's emails. We might want to allow editing a CRM Contact Detail in a stand alone form, to all a user to edit their contact's telephone or address, or name, but not the entire contact.
If we add shared CRM Contact Details, we will not want the revision id.
I think this is the trade off of having separate entity instead a field.
- πΊπΈUnited States jdleonard Austin, TX, USA
If we were to pursue this, I don't think it would be any time soon. There is definite complexity. Happy to WF pending demand.
- πΊπΈUnited States bluegeek9
Since the three fields are base field, we could add extra columns to the revision table to store the contact detail revision id.
This could introduce false positives if the contact detail is edited if some other way; if there were shared contact details.
- πΊπΈUnited States bluegeek9
The revision table will not work there are multiple emails/addresses/telephones.
- πΊπΈUnited States jdleonard Austin, TX, USA
Could you clarify your last comment? It works for Paragraphs, doesn't it?