- Issue created by @murz
- 🇩🇪Germany Anybody Porta Westfalica
@murz yes, that's by design. There are definitely cases for both. Feel free to add another formatter setting to use the reference on the preset instead. We decided to not implement that ourselves. In 95% it's good enough for us and the reference alternative also has drawbacks, so the user needs to decide per formatter then. (That's why it's called "Presets")
I disagree with the proposed solution a bit. Maybe there's a better way with backwards compatibility. I imagine something like a "Customize values" checkbox after selecting a preset, which then shows the fields. Otherwise the fields are hidden when selecting a preset and reference is used.
Let's first discuss that in detail and sketch the UX, before you invest time into the implementation. Thanks and great ideas! :)