- Issue created by @matthieuscarset
- πΈπ°Slovakia poker10
+1 for adding the information about project maintainers.
Copying from the related issue - I agree, that the information about maintainer(s) is important, as they invest time to maintain the modules and should be mentioned where possible. Without the names, it may look like Drupal (or Drupal Association) is maintaining everything displayed there. We also need to think about the target audience of the Project Browser, which currently seems to be mostly Drupal CMS users = ambitious marketers (without extra experience), so they can be confused by who maintans what.
- πΊπΈUnited States phenaproxima Massachusetts
Wait, don't work on this yet. This issue runs directly counter to β¨ Remove author from Projects Active , and it's not clear which way we want to go. This needs input from @chrisfromredfin.
Okay @phenaproxima,
Let's wait until one of the two ways available, is decided, I'll continue on this further if required.
Thanks!- πΈπ°Slovakia poker10
I am not sure this issue is exactly the opposite of the other one, because I think we want to add the maintainers here (maybe need to update the IS/title). If the author is the owner, then I think on d.o. is always one of the maintainers. If not, I do not see a point of listing the author. But for me it will be very sufficient to list the maintainers as on d.o..
- πͺπΈSpain fjgarlin
Yeah, I think both issues can be valid.
Author, as it is (which is creator of the project) shouldn't be relevant.
What we want is maintainers, and this issue is the follow-up that β¨ Remove author from Projects Active was referring to.So, I'd still remove author, clean up code, and then start afresh with maintainers. Note that this part of the API is NOT ready on d.o yet, so it won't be possible to do this yet.