- Issue created by @fjgarlin
- πΊπΈUnited States chrisfromredfin Portland, Maine
This is related to π Cleanup of Project object contract/constructor Active
- πΊπΈUnited States phenaproxima Massachusetts
This runs directly counter to β¨ Add information about authors and maintainers in project details page Active . Which one do we want to do?
- πΈπ°Slovakia poker10
If author != one of the maintainers on d.o., then this is probably not dependent. Otherwise -1 to this. Commented on the related issue.
- πͺπΈSpain fjgarlin
I commented on the other issue, I still think that this should be done as author (person that created the node) is not the same as maintainers.
As mentioned in the issue description
The person that created a module might or might not be a maintainer of the module, and they might even cancel their account and the module would still exists.
- πΊπΈUnited States phenaproxima Massachusetts
Thanks for clearing that up, @fjgarlin. I think it makes sense, then, to remove the $authors property from Project now, along with its Svelte representation, and add a new $maintainers property in the other issue when the d.o side is ready.
- πΊπΈUnited States phenaproxima Massachusetts
Closing as a duplicate of π Cleanup of Project object contract/constructor Active , let's just do this in there.
- πͺπΈSpain fjgarlin
Ouch! I had the MR ready, was just waiting for the pipeline to finish.
- πͺπΈSpain fjgarlin
But just saw that you already transferred the commit!! Great!