- Issue created by @jonathanshaw
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
Thanks for creating this issue @jonathanshaw. I'm interested in these except for the first three issues in A, and probably D. Obviously we can have additional discussion on those, so things could change, but that is the current status. In any case, having this roadmap is very helpful.
One thing we need to iron out is what happens to the 3.1.x branch if we create a 3.4.x branch. Does 3.1.x become a dead end? Obviously that is where it was headed anyway, but this is earlier than I expected. Let's explore that further.
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
I misunderstood A1, so that is now back on the table, and I edited my previous comment. A1 seems like a good idea, now that I am looking at it correctly.
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
I can take π Consider registration validation performance impact Active and any others you want me to run point on, assign to me as needed @jonathanshaw.
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
Removed a couple of obsolete issues from the roadmap
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
Added β¨ Allow non-admins to edit own registration information Active
-
john.oltman β
committed a6d43ba9 on 3.4.x
#3497738: Prepare for 3.4.0 release
-
john.oltman β
committed a6d43ba9 on 3.4.x
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
john.oltman β changed the visibility of the branch 3497738-edit-state-bc-layer to hidden.
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
john.oltman β changed the visibility of the branch 3497738-edit-state-bc-layer to active.
-
john.oltman β
authored 4edc2ef7 on 3.4.x
#3497738: Add BC layer for edit state
-
john.oltman β
authored 4edc2ef7 on 3.4.x
- πΊπΈUnited States john.oltman
Thanks for all your contributions @jonathanshaw!
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.