- Issue created by @plopesc
- Merge request !10061Issue #3485435: Make Layout Builder Create Inline blocks logic optional β (Closed) created by plopesc
- πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
This is not an actual bug, but a feature request.
- πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
MR created including test coverage and CR draft created.
- π¨π¦Canada m4olivei Grimsby, ON
Thanks for reporting this @plopesc and doing all the work to get to a resolution.
The need makes sense. We don't want users to be able to add inline blocks to the navigation, it's not designed for that. Blocks for navigation should be very intentional and opt into placement there. I like that we're restricting inline blocks. We were discussing on Drupal Slack whether this is a Navigaton stable blocker. I'm of the opinion that it is, for the reasons just mentioned. I'm marking it as such.
I've tested the resolution and reviewed the code. It all makes sense to me and the tests look good too. I've taken it for a spin on my local, and all looks good. Marking RTBC.
- π³πΏNew Zealand danielveza Brisbane, AU
Done a review & there is still a couple of older unresolved threads
- πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your review!
I would like to hear the opinions from other folks regarding the open threads, so let's keep it as Needs Review until we have more consensus about the given feedback.
- π¨π¦Canada m4olivei Grimsby, ON
On further conversation in Slack, we'll drop the Navigation stable blocker label, but keep it as a really important nice to have.
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to RTBC
3 months ago 11:20pm 3 January 2025 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Before
After
Probably duplicate screenshots but seems to be a few changes so thought I'd re-upload.
After the MR can see that the Create content block link is no longer there.
Opened up a follow up about refactoring core/modules/layout_builder/tests/src/FunctionalJavascript/InlineBlockTest.php. Believe the rest of this is good, and going to go out on a limb.
- πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Rebased and made some adjustments. I think it needs a new round of reviews to ensure there are no regressions.
The Needs Review Queue Bot β tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".
This does not mean that the patch necessarily needs to be re-rolled or the MR rebased. Read the Issue Summary, the issue tags and the latest discussion here to determine what needs to be done.
Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide β to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.
The Needs Review Queue Bot β tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".
This does not mean that the patch necessarily needs to be re-rolled or the MR rebased. Read the Issue Summary, the issue tags and the latest discussion here to determine what needs to be done.
Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide β to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.
- π³πΏNew Zealand quietone
There has been no review of the change record for this issue.
- πͺπΈSpain penyaskito Seville π, Spain πͺπΈ, UTC+2 πͺπΊ
I've rewritten some parts, hope it's more clear now. Also updated version to 11.2.0, and catch has published it.