There is no capacity to code images up as decorative.
This is required to ensure compliance with WCAG 2.2 1.1.1
We need the ability for the alt text field on the media library to be:
Note the alt text should be contextual in relation to the message/content it is associated with.
The alt text field is mandatory requiring text - it does not allow for no entry and placing "" inside the field to replicate decorative alt text results in """" in the code.
Note: there is no option when inserting the image into a web page to change or update the alt text, which is also required to ensure it is contextual (aligns with the messaging of the page)
alt text is returning """" in code which does not allow for assisted technology browsers to interpret correctly as decorative (ignoring the image). Some assisted technology browsers seems to be interpreting this as bad coding and trying to use AI to describe the image by stating appears to be .......
Often the generic alt text provided in the media library is not suitable for the image's use on the web page, it could be focused on the incorrect messaging, to descriptive, not descriptive enough.
The alt text should provide assisted technology users the same experience to consume information as a visual person. This includes not having to hear of an image that is only presented on the page as decorative (visual users will normally skip straight over this)
or
not unnecessarily repeating information already presented in the content (particularly immediately prior or afterwards)
Active
1.8
Code
My thoughts, there are three issues identified:
This conflicts with practice of making
We need the ability for the alt text field on the media library to be:
- left blank, or
- allow for a decorative option, or
- allow for the alt test to overridden when inserting image into a web page.
Link to WCAG https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/decorative/