- Issue created by @GRO
- Status changed to Postponed: needs info
2 months ago 7:26am 8 September 2024 - 🇩🇪Germany Anybody Porta Westfalica
Can someone explain why that should be implemented?
- 🇨🇴Colombia jasonac91
Hello,
I'm looking to understand more about the issue with the Field Group module not implementing hook_requirements. Here are a few questions to help clarify the situation:
Could you provide some insight into what specific functionalities are affected by the absence of hook_requirements in the Field Group module? Does this impact the module's stability or functionality in any significant way?
Is the error message Requirement function field_group_requirements not found affecting any other operational aspects of the site, or is it isolated to when this specific sensor is enabled in the monitoring settings?
What is the primary motivation for implementing hook_requirements in the Field Group module? Is it primarily for compliance with best practices, or are there specific scenarios where the absence of this hook leads to issues in system monitoring?
How frequently do users enable the 'Core Requirements' sensor for the Field Group module? Is this an essential part of typical site monitoring, or is it used in specific troubleshooting scenarios?
Are there any temporary workarounds that have been identified, or is the implementation of hook_requirements the only proposed solution?
Thank you for your assistance in resolving these queries.