2.x Breadcrumb field

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status will not be changed by this application; once this application is closed, you will be able to change the project status from Not covered to Opt into security advisory coverage. This is possible only 14 days after the project is created.
  Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
• Only the person who created the application will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory coverage. No other person will get the same permission from the same application; that applies also to co-maintainers/maintainers of the project used for the application.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a project moderator before posting the first comment on newly created applications. Project moderators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

Remember to change status, when the project is ready to be reviewed. In this queue, projects are only reviewed when the status is Needs review.

1. FILE: breadcrumb_field.module

/**
 * Implements hook_form_BASE_FORM_ID_alter().
 */
function breadcrumb_field_form_node_form_alter(&$form, FormStateInterface $form_state): void {

The description for that hook should also say for which form that hook is implemented, either by indicating that with the name of the class that implements the form (namespace included) or the form ID (which is usually indicated by getFormId()).

/**
 * @file
 * Contains breadcrumb_field.module.
 */

The usual description for a .module file is Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the module name given in the .info.yml file.

2. Inconsistency in Drupal core requirements.

FILE: breadcrumb_field.info.yml

core_version_requirement: ^9 || ^10

FILE: composer.json

  "require": { 
    "drupal/core": "^8.7.7 || ^9"
  }

3. FILE: src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/BreadcrumbFieldFormatter.php

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   */
  public function __construct($plugin_id, $plugin_definition, FieldDefinitionInterface $field_definition, array $settings, $label, $view_mode, array $third_party_settings, PathValidatorInterface $path_validator, BreadcrumbFieldBuilder $breadcrumb_field_builder) {

The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.

I have updated the code regarding review. Thanks!

Rest looks fine to me.

Let’s wait for a Code Review Administrator to take a look and if everything goes fine, you will get the role.

Thank you for your contribution and for your patience with the review process!

I am going to update your account so you can opt into security advisory coverage any project you create, including the projects you already created.

These are some recommended readings to help you with maintainership:

• Dries → ' post on Responsible maintainers
• Maintainership →
• Git version control system →
• Issue procedures and etiquette →
• Maintaining and responding to issues for a project →
• Release naming conventions → .

You can find more contributors chatting on Slack → or IRC → in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved → !
Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review → . I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

I thank the dedicated reviewers as well.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.