Would you consider creating a eca_maestro 2.x branch like other modules

Created on 17 July 2024, 10 months ago

To keep in line with the ECA 1.x nomenclature, should there be a eca_maestro 2.x that required eca 2.x and keep eca_maestro compatible with eca 1.x?

💬 Support request

Status

Active

Version

1.0

Component

Code

Created by

🇺🇸United States SocialNicheGuru

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.

Comments & Activities

Issue created by @SocialNicheGuru
Comment 10 months ago →
🇫🇷France mably
I'm totally ok with a 2.x branch but is it really required at the moment?

Current 1.x branch should work with ECA 2.x I think, have you tested it?
Comment 10 months ago →
🇺🇸United States SocialNicheGuru
This was just a naming symmetry thing.

There is no technical need to do it.

Production build 0.71.5 2024