[1.0.x] Single Directory Components Styleguide

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

1. Fix phpcs issues.

phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice --extensions=php,module,inc,install,test,profile,theme,css,info,txt,md,yml sdc_styleguide/

FILE: sdc_styleguide/README.md
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 1 ERROR AFFECTING 1 LINE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 29 | ERROR | [x] Expected 1 newline at end of file; 2 found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PHPCBF CAN FIX THE 1 MARKED SNIFF VIOLATIONS AUTOMATICALLY
----------------------------------------------------------------------

FILE: sdc_styleguide/sdc_styleguide.module
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 4 ERRORS AND 1 WARNING AFFECTING 5 LINES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   8 | ERROR   | [x] Missing function doc comment
  52 | ERROR   | [x] Missing function doc comment
  63 | WARNING | [ ] Line exceeds 80 characters; contains 96 characters
  78 | ERROR   | [ ] The array declaration extends to column 103 (the limit is 80). The array content should be split up over multiple lines
 104 | ERROR   | [ ] The array declaration extends to column 86 (the limit is 80). The array content should be split up over multiple lines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHPCBF CAN FIX THE 2 MARKED SNIFF VIOLATIONS AUTOMATICALLY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FILE: sdc_styleguide/src/Controller/StyleGuideController.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 1 ERROR AFFECTING 1 LINE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 181 | ERROR | The array declaration extends to column 88 (the limit is 80). The array content should be split up over multiple lines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Remove README.txt file.

README.md file should follow the content and formatting described in README.md template → .

3. FILE: sdc_styleguide.module

/**
 * @file
 * Primary module hooks for Single Directory Components Styleguide module.
 */

Drupal does not have primary and secondary hooks. Instead of that, it is preferable to use the usual description: Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the name of the module given in its .info.yml file.

4. FILE: src/SDCStyleguidePluginManager.php

  /**
   * Constructs the object.
   */
  public function __construct(\Traversable $namespaces, CacheBackendInterface $cache_backend, ModuleHandlerInterface $module_handler) {

FILE: src/Controller/StyleGuideController.php

  /**
   * The controller constructor.
   */
  public function __construct(

FILE: src/Drush/Generators/SDCStyleguideDemoGenerator.php

  /**
   * Inject dependencies into the Generator.
   */
  public function __construct(

FILE: src/Form/SDCDemoForm.php

  /**
   * {@inheritdoc}
   */
  public function __construct(protected ComponentPluginManager $componentPluginManager) {

FILE: src/Service/SDCDemoManager.php

  /**
   * The controller constructor.
   */
  public function __construct(

The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.

vishal.kadam, thank you for the feedback.

I've updated based on the PHPCS output and the other comments.

One thing though, regarding constructors using the namespace, on some instances this causes the line to go over 80 characters and it raises more PHPCS issues.

So I just used the class name instead.

Rest looks fine to me.

Let’s wait for a Code Review Administrator to take a look and if everything goes fine, you will get the role.

Please do not change the status to Reviewed & tested by the community after only checking what PHP_CodeSniffer reports. That status does not mean I do not know what other should I review. It means I manually reviewed all the code and I found out the code does not have security issues, it correctly uses the Drupal API, and it follows the Drupal coding standards.

Upping priority after 3 weeks.

Updating priority after 8 weeks.

Thank you for your contribution!
I updated your account so you can now opt into security advisory coverage for any project you created and every project you will create.

These are some recommended readings to help you with maintainership:

• Dries → ' post on Responsible maintainers
• Maintainership →
• Git version control system →
• Issue procedures and etiquette →
• Maintaining and responding to issues for a project →
• Release naming conventions → .

You can find more contributors chatting on Slack → or IRC → in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved → !

Thank you for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review → . I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.