- Issue created by @larowlan
- Status changed to Active
7 months ago 9:24am 28 May 2024 - Status changed to Needs review
7 months ago 6:03am 29 May 2024 - Assigned to larowlan
- Status changed to Needs work
6 months ago 2:30pm 11 June 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
Despite there now being 5 pipelines that have run, I still don't see an example of the output this generated? I feel like I'm missing something? 🙈
- Status changed to Needs review
6 months ago 6:53am 12 June 2024 - Issue was unassigned.
- 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
If we go with this, 📌 Create an Open API spec for the current mock HTTP responses Fixed will become more important.
OTOH, if for the 0.1 milestone of we want to do a more complete demo, including Field Widget-powered editing (see 📌 Add component instance edit form to contextual panel RTBC ), it'll become less important … or to be more precise: this statically hosted demo would be a subset of the demo.
- 🇫🇮Finland lauriii Finland
I just opened 🌱 Milestone 0.1.0: Experience Builder Demo Active which provides some context for the question asked in #8. Given that the demo is supposed to focus on the content creation aspects of Experience Builder, it doesn't seem that it would be complete unless it includes 📌 Add component instance edit form to contextual panel RTBC . Without that how would you change component contents?
- 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
Without that how would you change component contents?
My thoughts exactly 😅
We could expand the existing mock responses to include responses for the forms, and then together with 🌱 [META] Real-time preview: supporting back-end infrastructure Needs work , that would result in live updates. I believe we need #3453690 anyway if we want to achieve the goals for #3454094, because without that, any demo will fall flat.
- Assigned to lauriii
- 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
@lauriii just indicated he thinks we should NOT be doing a static demo, but an actual Drupal-powered demo.
But … this is already working and might be helpful in the short term?
I defer to @lauriii.
- Issue was unassigned.
- 🇫🇮Finland lauriii Finland
I believe we should be keeping this as close to the real thing as possible – we want to showcase a realistic experience. My impression from what I've heard is that if we wanted to do this with mock data, we would have to re-implement lots of things from Drupal in order to provide a realistic experience on top of the mock data model. Based on that, I said that we probably should then just use a Drupal site to back the demo. This doesn't mean that we couldn't host a separate static demo in the meanwhile, we just shouldn't use it for the demo.
- 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
I still think this is useful for manual testing MRs without needing to check a branch out locally
- Status changed to RTBC
6 months ago 10:26am 14 June 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
Let's be pragmatic and get this in for the purpose that @larowlan outlines — we'll find out automatically when/where we'll hit limitations.
Per @lauriii in #12, the DrupalCon Barcelona demo ( 🌱 Milestone 0.1.0: Experience Builder Demo Active may or may not use this, and likely won't.
P.S.: 📌 Create an Open API spec for the current mock HTTP responses Fixed might be able to help us keep the static version of the UI useful for longer.
-
Wim Leers →
committed ef598278 on 0.x authored by
larowlan →
Issue #3450311 by larowlan: CI: host static version of UI in GitLab...
-
Wim Leers →
committed ef598278 on 0.x authored by
larowlan →
- Status changed to Fixed
6 months ago 10:26am 14 June 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.