- Issue created by @Anybody
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Postponed
10 months ago 10:53am 25 April 2024 - 🇩🇪Germany Grevil
This is not easy to define. There seems to be no way to have schema errors to appear. I could try manually defining the schema, but I wouldn't know which layout options needs a schema and which don't.
I already defined a few layout option values through the layout builder of the article content type and created a test article afterward, but config inspector still didn't throw any errors. The tests also don't show any schema error, and I don't really see the point behind defining a schema.yml for another .yml defining layout_options...
Originally we thought, that the missing schema leads to type errors in 🐛 drowl_paragraphs_bs_type_layout_slideshow need a schema for layout_options Active . But it doesn't. That wasn't the missing schema's fault, but instead the way the layout_options "options" were defined in the layout options yml.
Concluding, I don't really see a reason defining a schema here. There are simply no benefits for a schema definition, and it is just too hard to even show a schema error for these layout options.
- Status changed to Active
10 months ago 12:48pm 2 May 2024 - 🇩🇪Germany Grevil
The missing schema definition now throws schema errors in our Vorlage. Let's fix them.
- Status changed to Needs review
10 months ago 1:17pm 2 May 2024 - 🇩🇪Germany Anybody Porta Westfalica
RTBC if it works fine. Please let @thomas.frobieter know about this.
- Status changed to RTBC
10 months ago 2:13pm 2 May 2024 - Status changed to Fixed
10 months ago 12:38pm 3 May 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.