- Issue created by @plopesc
- Merge request !6992Issue #3427046: Shortcuts toolbar links are not updated automatically when... β (Closed) created by plopesc
- Status changed to Needs review
10 months ago 11:22am 11 March 2024 - Status changed to RTBC
10 months ago 2:22pm 12 March 2024 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Ran the test-only feature and got failing tests as expected https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/drupal-3427046/-/jobs/1047844
Change record is present and reads fine.
Link in MR matchesIssue summary is complete (thank you for that!)
Following the steps believe I am seeing the issue.Adding the cacheTags appears to be inline with how it's done in other places.
LGTM!
- Status changed to Needs work
9 months ago 11:39pm 23 March 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom alexpott πͺπΊπ
I've added some comments to the MR. This looks like a nice thing to get fixed.
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 10:06am 25 March 2024 - πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your review @alexpott.
I think all the suggested improvements have been implemented properly and the R is ready for a new round of reviews.
- Status changed to RTBC
9 months ago 1:41pm 25 March 2024 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Re-ran test-only feature https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/drupal-3427046/-/jobs/1150296
Seems coverage is still there. Appears feedback from @alexpott has been addressed.
- Status changed to Needs work
9 months ago 4:43pm 25 March 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom alexpott πͺπΊπ
Discussed with @catch because I'm not sure about the affect of having a cache tag per user and whether it makes much sense. I think this might end up creating lots and lots of cache entries.
I think we should be able to invalidate cache by the user's current default shortcut set... ie. by doing something like
$default = $this->getDefaultSet($account); if ($default instanceof ShortcutSet) { Cache::invalidateTags($default->getCacheTags()); }
in assignUser and unassignUser... this is working for assignUser but is not working for unassignUser - yes we will ending clearing more cache when assign and unassign happen - but how often does this occur?
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 7:37am 26 March 2024 - πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your comment.
I thought the approach would not affect he number of cache entries, given that we already had the user context, but forgot to take into account the cachetags table, where a new row per tag is added.
Based on your suggestion, this new approach invalidate the previous set cache tag when assigning a new set or unassigning the current one. This is a bit more aggressive because it invalidates some entries unnecessarily, but maintains the size of cachetags table under control.
Also , we are not introducing a BC change, so the CR created would not be necessary anymore.
- Status changed to Needs work
9 months ago 9:26am 26 March 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom alexpott πͺπΊπ
@plopesc thanks for sticking with this. Cache invalidation of stuff like this is never simple. I agree with your proposal about moving stuff to ShortcutSetStorage and have commented on the MR with some thoughts.
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 3:09pm 26 March 2024 - πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
@alexpott New role for review including the new method
ShortcutSetStorage::getDisplayedToUser()
and deprecation ofshortcut_current_displayed_set()
&shortcut_default_set()
functions.Some followup questions.
- We are adding new parameters to ShortcutLazyBuilders service and deprecating 2 functions. Can we have both in a single CR? Or we might need 2?
shortcut_current_displayed_set()
implements thedrupal_static()
pattern. Do we need to add something special for this? It's being invoked only from ShortcutSetStorage to be refreshed once shortcut sets are being assigned/unassigned or removed.
Thank you
- Status changed to Needs work
9 months ago 3:28pm 26 March 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom alexpott πͺπΊπ
All in one CR is fine because it all goes together in my mind. Also the constructor changes are secondary and should only form a small part of the CR. Added some comments to the MR too.
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 4:48pm 26 March 2024 - πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Feedback has been addressed and CR updated.
See comment on MR about the need to add static cache to
getDisplayedToUser()
.While we're here, would you consider appropriate a follow up issue to provide a shortcut related cache context to avoid having a cache entry per user?. In an scenario where most users have selected the same shortcut_set, most of those cache entries would be redundant.
- πͺπΈSpain plopesc Valladolid
Created π [PP-1] Remove deprecated code from shortcut module Postponed to keep track of deprecation code that might need to be removed before 11.0.0.
Also updated IS to reflect the final approach taken.
- Status changed to RTBC
9 months ago 10:45pm 30 March 2024 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Added some simple typehints to the new function. Rest of the changes look good though
- Status changed to Fixed
9 months ago 8:54am 1 April 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom catch
The new cache invalidation approach looks good to me. I did briefly think about just using the user entity cache tag here, but then we'd potentially be invalidating entity caches for the user when we update their shortcut set which is much more likely to affect things (especially when the user is rendered as part of entities they've created like node/comment author).
Committed/pushed to 11.x and cherry-picked to 10.3.x, thanks!
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊ
Yay, one fewer bit of Shortcut architectural complexity! π
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.