- Issue created by @juanolalla
- 🇮🇳India vishal.kadam Mumbai
Thank you for applying!
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
- If you have not done it yet, you should run
phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice
on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report. - For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
- The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
- We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .
The important notes are the following.
- It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
- Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
- It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .
- If you have not done it yet, you should run
- 🇺🇸United States dvenukumar frederick
Please fix below Coding standards.
FILE: ...s_static_map/src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/AddressStaticMapFormatter.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 0 ERRORS AND 7 WARNINGS AFFECTING 7 LINES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
42 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
66 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
67 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
83 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
84 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
85 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
128 | WARNING | \Drupal calls should be avoided in classes, use dependency
| | injection instead
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Status changed to Needs work
9 months ago 6:51am 19 February 2024 - 🇺🇸United States dvenukumar frederick
@juanolalla : Please fix below Coding standards.
FILE: ...s_static_map/src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/AddressStaticMapFormatter.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 0 ERRORS AND 7 WARNINGS AFFECTING 7 LINES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
42 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
66 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
67 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
83 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
84 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
85 | WARNING | t() calls should be avoided in classes, use
| | \Drupal\Core\StringTranslation\StringTranslationTrait and
| | $this->t() instead
128 | WARNING | \Drupal calls should be avoided in classes, use dependency
| | injection instead
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 9:14pm 19 February 2024 - 🇪🇸Spain juanolalla
Fixed the referred coding standards: https://git.drupalcode.org/project/address_static_map/-/commit/4b66060de...
- 🇮🇳India rushiraval
I am changing the issue priority as per issue priorities → .
- Status changed to Needs work
6 months ago 4:56pm 24 May 2024 I think it would be a good idea to break out the code that is used to "Generate signature from premium crypto key or APY key signing secret" into its own function. The function its currently in is for rendering, which doesn't need to be "in charge of" signature generation.
"Must be between 1 and 16 (inclusive) for Mapquest"
MapQuest should have the "Q" capitalized. I don't see any validation to make sure the user doesn't select an invalid value for a MapQuest map. Also, the module states that MapQuest isn't supported yet, so maybe this message should be removed until it is?
FILE: src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/AddressStaticMapFormatter.php
50: Data types in @param tags need to be fully namespaced
180: \Drupal calls should be avoided in classes. Use dependency injection.- 🇮🇳India vishal.kadam Mumbai
I am changing priority as per Issue priorities → .
- Status changed to Closed: won't fix
about 2 months ago 8:19am 24 September 2024 - 🇮🇳India vishal.kadam Mumbai
This thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for several months. Therefore, I am assuming that you are no longer pursuing this application, and I marked it as Closed (won't fix).
If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, then please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.