[1.0.x] Advanced Sanitize

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

1. improvements is a wrong name for a branch, which needs to be deleted. Release branch names always end with the literal .x as described in Release branches.

2. FILE: advanced_sanitize.info.yml

package: Custom

That line is used by custom modules created for specific sites. It is not a package name used for projects hosted on drupal.org.

3. FILE: src/Commands/AdvancedSanitizeCommands.php

  /**
   * SanitizeCommentsCommands constructor.
   *
   * @param \Drupal\advanced_sanitize\AdvancedSanitizeService $advancedSanitizeService
   *   Advanced sanitize service.
   */
  public function __construct(AdvancedSanitizeService $advancedSanitizeService) {

The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.

Thank you for review vishal.kadam → !

Module's Package was changed to Development, improvements branch was removed and __construct() docblocks were updated.

Moving issue back to Needs review.

I am changing the issue priority as per issue priorities → .

1. config schema is missing, see https://www.drupal.org/docs/drupal-apis/configuration-api/configuration-... →
2. AdvancedSanitizeService::logger: doc block type is wrong

Otherwise looks good to me.

Thanks for your contribution, Ilya!

I updated your account so you can opt into security advisory coverage now.

Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:

• Dries → ' post on Responsible maintainers
• Best practices for creating and maintaining projects →
• Maintaining a drupal.org project with Git →
• Commit messages - providing history and credit →
• Release naming conventions → .
• Helping maintainers in the issue queues →

You can find lots more contributors chatting on Slack → or IRC → in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved → !

Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review → . I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.