- Issue created by @GaëlG
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Active
about 1 year ago 2:12pm 20 October 2023 - 🇫🇷France GaëlG Lille, France
This issue could interfere with 📌 Form tokens are now rendered lazily, allow forms to opt in to be cacheable Needs review if it's done before it. But it's not too soon to think about how to implement the deprecation.
- 🇫🇷France GaëlG Lille, France
The conversation about deprecation started in 📌 Form tokens are now rendered lazily, allow forms to opt in to be cacheable Needs review , but I continue it here as it's now out of the scope of the former.
@catch #2578855#138: Yes. The question is: is it OK that some forms trigger no deprecation? They can have bad cacheability metadata, which until now leads to no bug, but will lead to bugs when we will ultimately default to cacheable.
And if the answer to that question is no, then another question arises: how to make sure every form maintainer and form_alter maintainer (has pointed by @jonathanshaw) ensures it gives the right metadata?