- Issue created by @josephcheek
- 🇺🇸United States josephcheek Provo, UT
I added a bit of code to check whether the field definition for the label field exists before attempting to set the label. No MR yet because it needs checking, testing, rewriting, debating, rewriting again, etc. https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/auto_entitylabel-3387731/-/commit/5f124...
- last update
over 1 year ago Composer error. Unable to continue. - @josephcheek opened merge request.
- 🇺🇸United States josephcheek Provo, UT
ok I couldn't figure out how to get a diff to patch composer without creating a MR, so MR created 8-).
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 10:38am 11 October 2023 - last update
over 1 year ago Patch Failed to Apply - 🇮🇳India viren18febs
Hi @josephcheek
I have fixed the issue and created a patch file for your reference. please review - Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 7:54am 31 October 2023 - Assigned to AditiVB
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 8:16am 31 October 2023 - last update
over 1 year ago Composer error. Unable to continue. - Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 7:08am 3 November 2023 - 🇮🇳India AditiVB
Hi @viren moving this to NW as some composer error is showing in your patch file .
- Assigned to AditiVB
- last update
over 1 year ago Composer error. Unable to continue. - Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 9:14am 3 November 2023 - 🇮🇳India viren18febs
This is the reason behind composer error!
Drupal core development requires Composer 2.3.6, but Composer 2.2.7 is installed. Please run 'composer self-update'.
- Status changed to Needs work
8 months ago 2:55pm 8 August 2024 - Status changed to Postponed: needs info
7 months ago 6:17pm 30 August 2024 - 🇫🇷France dqd London | N.Y.C | Paris | Hamburg | Berlin
This should be at least "Normal" not "Minor" if we decide to go that route... And actually - in this state of solution - it would be rather a Feature request, not a bug. Why? Well because it wasn't in the project's initial scope to deal with badly managed bulk actions where content with no label has been added to AEL routines or to deal with crash testing the module against types with have no label at all. Types without label shouldn't even have the settings for Auto EntityLabel available TBH. That would be the bug then for me. But OK, there are always corner cases.
But since this isn't my module, I don't get to decide the logic that goes into it 8-/.
Short off-topic: There is no such thing like your or my module. This is an Open Source project based on community work under GPL license which lives from the support of every contributor and their motivations and ideas. This can cause different opinions in how things need to be solved, yes, and I agree with you regarding the LabelManager. But I would even go further and argue why do we fix a module called "Auto EntityLabel" regarding an issue appearing when no label exist? Why do you try to even set up AEL for this type?
Thanks for all the efforts and reports and patches in here but please elaborate more on why this is a required feature or bug fix. The patch looks great (#4 and #12) but to place a condition like this in here increases performances hogging, especially on large bulk requests like mentioned in this issue here multiple times. I would argue we rather need a condition which disables AEL completely on types without label. Because these types are completely out of the scope and meaning of this module.
I think this needs further discussion before re-rolling and committing.