Option to remove all unpublished entities from the results.

👍

Could be tricky. Could be easy. I’m keen. Will have a look this weekend.

Users without access to view unpublished data wouldn't see the unpublished items, but your request is specifically asking for unpublished items to always be hidden from entity reference fields.

My gut feel is this should stay as permissions, and Drupal already has a way for you to achieve this.

But perhaps a hook could do what you need?

use Drupal\Core\Cache\RefinableCacheableDependencyInterface;
use Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityPublishedInterface;
use Drupal\Core\Field\FieldItemListInterface;

/**
 * Implements hook_graphql_compose_field_results_alter().
 */
function MYMODULE_graphql_compose_field_results_alter(array &$results, array $context, RefinableCacheableDependencyInterface $metadata) {
  $field_list = $context['value'] ?? NULL;
  if (!$field_list instanceof FieldItemListInterface) {
    return;
  }

  if ($field_list->getFieldDefinition()->getType() === 'entity_reference') {
    $results = array_filter(
      $results,
      fn ($entity) => ($entity instanceof EntityPublishedInterface) ? $entity->isPublished() : TRUE
    );
  }
}

Could this perhaps be repurposed as a feature request for filters on edge queries?

Demand for this feature has recently skyrocketed 200%

I'll look into it more.

Ok, deployed to develop

https://git.drupalcode.org/project/graphql_compose/-/commit/bfec317fefee...

Its in there somewhere. Lots to unpack.
I've applied it to entity references and edges.

Let me know how you go with your testing!

Tried to test, I:

• Pulled latest 2.0.x
• Cleared cache (on my contrib rig, no other modules installed except dependencies)
• Searched for new options in /admin/config/graphql_compose
• Checked the explorer

I can't see where/how to set a filter on the query, what am I missing?

It should be under Advanced settings at admin/config/graphql_compose/settings

Exclude unpublished entities which will be on by default for new installs

Ahah! The one place I didn't look.

Yes, this passes manual testing of a simple unpublished article. Very nice. I believe this meets the criteria of the IS as it stands.

Does exactly what I wanted. Thanks for the help @almunnings

In 2.0.0 cheers