- Issue created by @kopeboy
- 🇮🇹Italy kopeboy Milan
Probably this isn't a big deal with current implementers since I guess the social providers have other checks in place, but I'm not sure and I can imagine other providers and site builders mistakenly feel when something is called "secret" but is not encrypted.
- 🇺🇸United States wells Seattle, WA
Yes, this would be ideal. We had 📌 Implementing Key for storing API Credentials Closed: duplicate planned for the 4.0.x work but unfortunately we didn't get to it in time. I'm not totally sure this would be breaking but I'm guessing it would...
Regardless I'm happy to consider this for anyone who has some time to spend on it.
This ticket has more details so I'm gonna close 📌 Implementing Key for storing API Credentials Closed: duplicate as a dup.