- Issue created by @chrisfromredfin
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 5:01am 8 August 2023 - 🇮🇳India urvashi_vora Madhya Pradesh, India
Hi,
Please review this logo
Thanks
- 🇮🇪Ireland lostcarpark
Here's a preview of the logo in #2:
The first problem I see with this is the text in the circles is quite small and very hard for the average user to read at the size the logo appears in the module cards. The second issue for me is that the hand has quite a thin outline, so doesn't have very much contrast with the background.
So for me, at present, this one is a miss. In general I prefer to avoid text in logos, but I'm not sure of a good way to get the concept of different formats across without it.
Hope you'll keep trying.
- 🇮🇳India urvashi_vora Madhya Pradesh, India
Please review these logos.
Thanks
- 🇳🇱Netherlands tinto Amsterdam
Oops, I uploaded the non-compressed version of the second option in #5. Here's the correct file.
- 🇺🇸United States chrisfromredfin Portland, Maine
I think we need to stay away from the text a bit due to making sure it can scale, so in this way I like Tinto's options. Between those, I think #2 conveys "text format" very well, but not necessarily the "choice."
If I had to choose today, I think https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2023-08-11/allowed_formats-logo-02-o... → would be great, but might be made better if we could maybe throw a checkbox in one or two of those four corner options. Or, perhaps fill in one of the circles in the corners?
- Status changed to RTBC
about 1 year ago 8:38pm 12 September 2023 - 🇺🇸United States bsnodgrass
Updating the proposed resolution with the preferred logo to date.
Setting this issue to RTBC, the module maintainers could elect to modify it to convey the idea of selecting options.
- Status changed to Fixed
about 2 months ago 9:01pm 24 September 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.