- πΊπΈUnited States karlshea Minneapolis πΊπΈ
@awm from previous experience working with DAM companies (including a company acquired by Canto), I don't think we're going to get any engagement from @flightdev. Take a look at what just happened with the 10.2 tag, they renamed the module machine name which will prevent upgrades.
I have a site that needs media entity integration, I'm thinking of forking the module and basing it off of this branch with any fixes from 10.2 pulled in. Any thoughts? Would you want to co-maintain?
- πΊπΈUnited States awm
I think we were in the process of attempting to take over the namespace.
https://www.drupal.org/project/canto_connector/issues/3332044 π¬ Offering to maintain Canto Connector Active
but I don't mind forking the module but I'd appreciate if we keep the attributions of commits. - πΊπΈUnited States karlshea Minneapolis πΊπΈ
I don't think taking over the namespace will happen if the current maintainer has been making releases (see the recent 10.2 version).
- πΊπΈUnited States karlshea Minneapolis πΊπΈ
Maybe that isn't true, I think you need to move π¬ Offering to maintain Canto Connector Active back to the project ownership queue to request moderation assistance. Or I can also create a co-maintainer offer issue for myself and try to move it through.
- πΊπΈUnited States awm
> back to the project ownership queue to request moderation assistance.
I am not suer how to do that - feel free to move it.
- πΊπΈUnited States awm
I created a new proj here
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/cantoKarlShea I can add you as a co-maintainer. Please take a look and and lets discuss there. if we can ever consolidate the modules into one, I am happy to do so.
- πΊπΈUnited States karlshea Minneapolis πΊπΈ
I talked with my client and they think this whole thing is kind of clunky anyways and they're more in favor of just removing the integration altogether. But I would be open to co-maintaining to at least get it working, if we do get a D10/Media solution working I can keep it enabled on my client's site.
However I did ask on Slack and one of the Drupal moderators said that if you do create a fork don't use the trademark in the module's short name, they suggested "cdam" as the module name but the description can be "Canto DAM" in the title on the page: https://drupal.slack.com/archives/C1BMUQ9U6/p1715288857811109
- πΊπΈUnited States awm
unfortunately I can't rename it. If they want to take over the name space they could
- πΊπΈUnited States karlshea Minneapolis πΊπΈ
Alright, let's see how it goes. Do you want to add me as a co-maintainer over there and I'll start taking a look?