- First commit to issue fork.
- Merge request !10990Issue #3161345: Options allowed values cache pollution → (Open) created by vidorado
- 🇪🇸Spain vidorado Logroño (La Rioja)
Created a MR, applied the patch from #5 and added a kernel test.
- First commit to issue fork.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom oily Greater London
Updated the test, added comments to clarify each step.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom oily Greater London
All pipeline tests are green. Except test-only test which fails as it should.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom oily Greater London
Added comments to the test in the MR.
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Added some additional comments after doing some code standard reviews. I didn't resolve any of the open threads but if we can do that next please.
- 🇪🇸Spain vidorado Logroño (La Rioja)
@smustgrave I've replied to your comments.
Thanks for the review!
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
@berdir's points in #7 and #9 still haven't been adequately answered. Should the cache key instead use the entity ID?
- heddn Nicaragua
From re-reviewing the docs on
options_allowed_values
, I think we need to cache it on both, yes. Leaving at NW for this.