- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
So we do have β¨ Exclude based on noindex or sitemap exclusion and hide UI Active which seems more inline for this module.
This feature still feels like it could be a submodule or it's own.
Thoughts?
- π©πͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica
Yeah still makes sense as submodule. It would be helpful in cases where you want a separate option and can't reuse noindex or sitemap-exclusion for any reasons.
As written in β¨ Exclude based on noindex or sitemap exclusion and hide UI Active the code should be quite similar in all of these? Just the boolean source is different. This might still be an easier one.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 5:45pm 2 February 2024 - π©πͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica
Nice, planned for review by our team! :)
- πͺπΈSpain estoyausente
wow, happy to see this. Currently I'm not using the module and I don't remenber the context where I created it, but thanks for incluiding!
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Still need to see how it works with non text fields like entity references. Or we limit the fields settings to just text fields for now
- Status changed to Needs work
12 months ago 5:15pm 28 May 2024 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Think it needs a little work around non text fields. Or we exclude non text fields from the form.
-
smustgrave β
committed c6bacbfd on 3.0.x
Resolve #3055325 "Exclude entity based"
-
smustgrave β
committed c6bacbfd on 3.0.x
- Status changed to Fixed
4 months ago 4:10pm 6 January 2025 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Lets take a risk and go ahead and include this.
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.