- 🇸🇪Sweden twod Sweden
This issue was a major fuckup, breaking deploy scripts and existing workflows without warning because some people are somehow offended by an acronym?
What's so damn inappropriate that sex can not be apart of even an acronym? You ARE CREATING issues with "inappropriate words" specifically by doing things like this.The fact that csex (AND csim!!!!???) was removed in some versions, there was no deprecation period, no replacement alias (at least not in 2.0.0-rc4), and the change was made for this specific reason is astonishingly stupid and an embarrassment for the maintainers!
Had I seen this before we changed over to the 2.x branch I would rather have dropped the module completely than supporting such weak and unreliable maintainership.I would have been ashamed to propose a change like this and am now instead ashamed of being a part of a community which bent to such petty requests - achieving nothing but wasting countless developer's time over nothing but someone deciding sex offends them.
What if I say "drush" offsends me because "ush" in Swedish has a negative association? Or that we should not even use "association" because it contains "ass"? See how moronic this gets if you even let it start?