- First commit to issue fork.
Currently you can configure the output of a boolean field on a field settings level. For views itself though there are more use cases:
While we are converting base fields to use field formatters, this lack of support for boolean formatting causes problems in #2342045: Standard views base fields need to use same rendering as Field UI fields, for formatting, access checking, and translation consistency → . Once #2342045: Standard views base fields need to use same rendering as Field UI fields, for formatting, access checking, and translation consistency → gets in, not having all those options available on the boolean formatter would be a regression.
Extend the boolean field formatter with options to support these display formats. This will allow #2342045: Standard views base fields need to use same rendering as Field UI fields, for formatting, access checking, and translation consistency → to not regress functionality for boolean fields.
Commit.
Boolean fields have more flexible display formats.
The boolean formatter schema is slightly expanded.
Not all content is available!
It's likely this issue predates Contrib.social: some issue and comment data are missing.