fubarhouse → credited davesparks → .
fubarhouse → credited davesparks → .
fubarhouse → credited davesparks → .
VladimirAus → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .
I like this for marketing, a lot.
We've put a lot of pain and effort into making keeping current an achievable goal for normal operation, and we should lead with that. If someone is owning and maintaining Drupal the version and updates may be more relevant to them. And perhaps they'll be making choices about when they time update. But if someone is buying into Drupal now imo they should be buying into the idea that they will keeping current with the latest stable release.
I don't see major releases having a major cost impact on clients. I see lack of upkeep having a major cost impact. I'd also like to send an end to the term "end of life" because outside of the community, it doesn't mean what you think it means. : )
froboy → credited davesparks → .
dreambubbler → credited davesparks → .
Chroid → credited davesparks → .
VladimirAus → credited davesparks → .
JCT321 → credited davesparks → .