- Issue created by @Anybody
- 🇪🇸Spain marcoscano Barcelona, Spain
Thank you for the proposal.
This is a very simple and lightweight module, where the underlying architecture is just to use JS to hide/show values that already come from the back-end. Doing what you describe is technically a very different solution, which IMO would go beyond this module's original purpose.From what I see on the module page, the other module you describe is trying to fix exactly this? If that's the case, I'd rather we concentrate efforts to make that module work well, instead of replicating the new feature here?
Marking this as won't fix, but others feel free to keep commenting here if there is a lot of people that think differently.
Thanks!
- 🇩🇪Germany Anybody Porta Westfalica
Thank you very much for the quick response @marcoscano. Totally fine as your maintainer decision, I just wanted to propose that idea :)
- 🇩🇪Germany Anybody Porta Westfalica
PS: Maybe the "minimum" functionality is still more interesting than the "Unlimited" support and more in the focus of this module regarding UX.