- Issue created by @fago
- π¦πΊAustralia larowlan π¦πΊπ.au GMT+10wim leers β credited larowlan β . 
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊIt's not that we specified the wrong property, it's that the inherited \Drupal\Core\Field\FieldItemBase::mainPropertyName()does not make sense for XB's field type.(I bet there will be more such things β few field types in the Drupal ecosystem have as many field properties as XB's field typeβ¦) Thanks for the bug report! 
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊWTAF happened to this MR? It's still @fago's commit from 10:43, so I don't think he pushed again? There was 1 commit, now there's 8?! I've been intermittently seeing this kind of problem on GitLab. Seems like it's having some integrity issuesβ¦ Was going to merge, will now wait a bit for this to re-settle π 
- π¦πΉAustria fago ViennaThanks for the quick reviews! It's not that we specified the wrong property, it's that the inherited \Drupal\Core\Field\FieldItemBase::mainPropertyName() does not make sense for XB's field type. yep, exactly! >here was 1 commit, now there's 8?! They were there from the beginning. 
 Maybe, there was some glitch between 0.x and 1.x when I created the PR, I was confused about the branches. But the diff is correct, so it should be fine to just squash-merge it.
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊAHHHHHHHHHH! So you developed on 0.x, the MR targeted 0.x and then you changed it to 1.x 
 That explains everything.Except β¦ HOW F'ING STUPID GitLab is being here, for not showing such a significant change (different target branch) in the "activity" entries: 
 It lists zero-impact activity there, but this it does not. Made me lose 20 minutes of my day. π¬ But the diff is correct, so it should be fine to just squash-merge it. Can't do that due to A) it not applying to 1.x, B) hence not running tests, C) the d.o-GitLab integration. Need to use the "merge" button on d.o, and then this won't work. Rebased to be able to land this π 
- π¦πΉAustria fago ViennaOh I see, I'm sry to have caused this issue and it ate your time. The 1.x/0.x separation was new to me. :-/ 
- 
            
              wim leers β
             committed b65e33b5 on 1.x authored by 
            
              fago β
            
Issue #3537783 by fago, wim leers, larowlan: ComponentTreeItem must... 
 
- 
            
              wim leers β
             committed b65e33b5 on 1.x authored by 
            
              fago β
            
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊNo worries β it's an adjustment for all of us. I'm disappointed by GitLab/d.o's integration with it, not in your MR, that I'm very grateful for! π Merged π 
- Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.