- Issue created by @phenaproxima
- π¨πSwitzerland berdir Switzerland
> JSON makes sense for default content because the only real advantage of YAML is that it is more human-readable and supports comments.
If we want to support that, fine. Nobody every asked for it in the default_content issue queue i think. But, the human readable/editable part is exactly why I chose YAML.
We've used hal_json-based default_content 1.x for years and it was IMHO a pain to work with. Very verbose and JSON is really tedious to read and make some minor adjustments. which was actually more of an issue with hal_json because an export resulted in lots of different user/date changes.
My suggestion would be keep this is a low prio feature request, if someone wants it/works on it fine, but otherwise...