- Issue created by @larowlan
- π¦πΊAustralia larowlan π¦πΊπ.au GMT+10
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊ
I don't think this needs to be a stable blocker; XB at release won't yet allow additional
ComponentSourceInterface
implementations. Which means this would be an entirely internal refactor? - π¦πΊAustralia larowlan π¦πΊπ.au GMT+10
I know @mohit_aghera has a pinto component source plugin that is grappling with this so I respectfully disagree
- π¦πΊAustralia larowlan π¦πΊπ.au GMT+10
Adding back tag until the conversation above is resolved (we can always remove it again, just want to make sure it's not lost)
- π§πͺBelgium wim leers Ghent π§πͺπͺπΊ
Can we first do π [PP-1] Refactor GeneratedFieldExplicitInputUxComponentSourceBase and FieldForComponentSuggester to need only SDC's ComponentMetadata, not SDC plugin instances Postponed , so that everything is at least using not SDC plugin instances but just
\Drupal\Core\Theme\Component\ComponentMetadata
?After that, I agree the client-side schema stuff is important to generalize! Related: π Evolve the organically grown `::getClientSideInfo()` into something cohesive Active .