- Issue created by @dunx
- 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
It's possible that "skip this step" was only added to ensure it's understood that you don't have to choose anything here, even though they're functionally identical.
Assigning to @ckrina for input.
- 🇪🇸Spain ckrina Barcelona
Thanks both for reviewing this!
It's possible that "skip this step" was only added to ensure it's understood that you don't have to choose anything here
That's exactly the reason. The hypothesis is that making it obvious that they don't have to choose will help in terms of clarity for new users, avoiding them asking themselves "If I click next will I mess it up?". Some might try to interact with the form first or even choose something they don't want because they assume the UI needs it. So its goal is to improve learnability and reduce friction on this step.
That said, we'll test the installer on the user testing round on February and if we see it fails it we'll iterate on the proposal.
- 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
Thanks @ckrina. Since this has now been confirmed as an intentional design decision, closing this issue out. But feel free to reopen if there's more discussion to be had here.