- Issue created by @snap_x
- Merge request !189Issue #3486210: Reverse reference doesn't work for Group relationship โ (Open) created by snap_x
- ๐บ๐ฆUkraine snap_x
I provided a solution in the MR that allows to select "Reverse reference: Group relationship using Content" field for the index.
Based on this value the views can filter Content per group. - ๐ฆ๐นAustria drunken monkey Vienna, Austria
Wow, would be great if thatโs all it takes. Thanks a lot!
However, as Iโm not using the Group module myself weโll need either confirmation from others that this works as expected or some test coverage (which would add the Group module as a test dependency).
Could you maybe post to these other issues (or to Slack, etc.) to tell people about your solution? Maybe someone will be interested and test your MR.PS: It seems you (like many others โ it's really easy to misinterpret) are confused by the "Issue tags" field. As the guidelines โ state, they aren't meant for free text tags related to the issue, but only for specific categorization purposes, usually by module maintainers.
So, if you aren't sure your current usage is correct, please just leave the field empty.