- Issue created by @balintbrews
- 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
+1 — who's interested? 🤓
(I'll be around sufficiently I think though to approve any MRs in this area, but I'd definitely like to never have any SPOF code owner!)
The CODEOWNERS file currently lists only Wim as the owner for the "DX: CI" section. Given his limited availability in the upcoming weeks, we need to expand code ownership to maintain merge velocity. This is particularly relevant for time-sensitive changes like
📌
Enforce ESLint and Prettier on Cypress tests
Active
.
CODEOWNERS for similar single-owner dependencies.Active
0.0
Miscellaneous
+1 — who's interested? 🤓
(I'll be around sufficiently I think though to approve any MRs in this area, but I'd definitely like to never have any SPOF code owner!)