- Issue created by @dieterholvoet
- 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
Adding this argument will result in backwards-incompatible changes, but since a new 2.x branch was started we can do that there, right? I feel like it would also be a good idea to get rid of the
$account
argument. Plugins that need this can inject thecurrent_user
service instead. - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
I pushed a pretty big refactor of the module:
- I replaced the original approach with an approach where I override the
EntityFormDisplay
entity class in order to have access to the field entity - I added an extra approach where I override the
TypedDataManager
&RecursiveValidator
classes in order to add support for validating entities in non-form contexts, e.g. when executingDrupal\Core\Entity\FieldableEntityInterface::validate()
. - I removed the
$account
argument of theDrupal\required_api\Plugin\RequiredPluginInterface::isRequired()
method, because it can be replaced with an injectedcurrent_user
service - I added the
$entity
argument to theDrupal\required_api\Plugin\RequiredPluginInterface::isRequired()
method, in order to have access to e.g. other fields to determine whether or not a field should be required.
Let me know what you think!
- I replaced the original approach with an approach where I override the
- Status changed to Needs review
6 months ago 8:58pm 9 July 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
The reason for this refactor is my intention of releasing a
required_by_content_moderation_state
module, allowing fields to only be required when their associated entity reaches a certain Content Moderation state. Before, this would only be necessary by reading parameters of the global request, and even then it wouldn't work when programatically validating entities. After the changes in this MR, all these things work. - Status changed to Needs work
6 months ago 9:25pm 9 July 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
Okay, this isn't it yet.
Drupal\required_api\Entity\RequiredApiEntityFormDisplay::buildForm()
isn't executed when submitting the form, so any new values aren't being considered in the required logic. - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
Seems like the first chance to get an entity object which is updated with the last form changes is in
ContentEntityForm::validateForm()
, after$this->buildEntity()
is called. It seems like at that point, the required validation errors are already present in the form state though. This means that it's impossible to determine the required status based on the entity object, if we want to change the required status before the form is built/validated. The alternative is to do it after the form is built/validated and to remove any unnecessary required validation errors from the form state. I'll try out this approach in the MR. - Status changed to Needs review
6 months ago 10:09am 10 July 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
I replaced the overridden
EntityFormDisplay
with an overriddenFormErrorHandler
, that seems to do the trick. - 🇧🇪Belgium dieterholvoet Brussels
There is a visual difference: this approach makes it so the delayed required fields still show the required asterisk, but they don't trigger a form error. Personally, I like this even better.
-
dieterholvoet →
committed 53ec51c3 on 3.0.x
Issue #3460341 by dieterholvoet: The field entity should be passed to...
-
dieterholvoet →
committed 53ec51c3 on 3.0.x
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.