- Issue created by @John_B
- Status changed to Needs review
11 months ago 12:20pm 27 May 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom John_B London (UK), Worthing (UK), Innsbruck (Tirol)
Attached patch adds a checkbox which makes the addition of a radom string to each footnote ID optional.
- πΏπ¦South Africa rudolfbyker South Africa
I also need this. Alternate solution: Use an ID like `node-x-footnote-y` where x is the node ID and y is the footnote's ordinal or value.
- π¬π§United Kingdom scott_euser
Can switch away from random as long as its unique, e.g. perhaps as @rudolfbyker noted (though I haven't look in depth at implications). In any case needs MR + test coverage to match. Thanks!
- π¬π§United Kingdom scott_euser
scott_euser β changed the visibility of the branch 3450120-make-footnote-link-consistent to hidden.
- π¬π§United Kingdom scott_euser
Okay got a chance to hit this issue myself and I I like the suggestion in #4. Since status quo is always random, nobody could yet have a dedicated link to a specific footnote, so I don't think we need to make this opt-in/opt-out. Added comments to the MR to make it clear.
- π¬π§United Kingdom scott_euser
Okay this is now ready, let me know if it works for you
- π§πͺBelgium dieterholvoet Brussels
For me this fixes the issue where links from citations to grouped references at the bottom of the page weren't working anymore.
- π§πͺBelgium dieterholvoet Brussels
Never mind, that doesn't fix it. I now have citations that link to
#footnote1
, while the footnote has an ID offootnote1-0
. That's on a page with multiple text areas with footnotes and with all of them aggregated at the bottom of the page.