- Issue created by @tim bozeman
-
Tim Bozeman β
committed 41f6eedd on 2.1.x
Issue #3447441 by Tim Bozeman: Temporary Toolbar + integrations
-
Tim Bozeman β
committed 41f6eedd on 2.1.x
- Status changed to Fixed
11 months ago 7:30pm 15 May 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.
- π§πͺBelgium flyke
Hi Tim,
could you clarify what this toolbar+ does and why it needs to be integrated into lb_plus ?
If its crucial, you should add it as a dependency in the module json and info file.
If not, then the lb_plus code needs adjustments because right now, lb_plus 2.1.x does not work if you do not have the toolbar+ module - πΊπΈUnited States tim bozeman
Heya flyke,
Thank you for the issues about the integrations! I know you are pretty familiar with LB+ so let me make a quick screen recording to show you Edit+ β and Toolbar+ β . The idea is that LB+ is going to be one tool in a suite of tools that makes up a whole page builder. LB+ get's stuff on the screen fast and move it around. Edit+ lets users edit it in place. Stylish is going to let users do all the CSS. We are going for a true WYSIWYG kind of. Toolbar+ is just that shared toolbar on the left. I have a feeling that in light of the new Navigation module we'll be integrating with that sooner than later.
There are a few commands on the Toolbar+ page to give the page builder setup in Umami if you'd like.
Whatcha think?
- π§πͺBelgium flyke
Hi Tim,
I just looked at your screen recording.... that is amazing ! No hassle quick clean frontend editing. Great work !
And I will be looking at this and the Navigation integration with great interest. Seems like a no brainer must have if your project uses layoutbuilder.I have a project with paragraphs that uses the geysir module for frontend editing of the paragraphs. They geysir module itself has no navigation_top_bar integration, but I added it myself in a custom module and it was not that much work.
So what I think? Amazing work, keep it up: this brings the content editing to a whole new level.