Use standardized SPDX license identifiers

Make sense. Applied MR and searched for GNU-GPL-2.0-or-later and seems everything has been replaced.

Not sure this needs any kind of sign off or not but going to mark.

I think adopting this standard is a good idea, and we could document this in LibraryDiscoveryParser for the name field:

   * - license: If the remote property is set, the license information is
   *   required. It has 3 properties:
   *   - name: The human-readable name of the license.
   *   - url: The URL of the license file/information for the version of the
   *     library used.
   *   - gpl-compatible: A Boolean for whether this library is GPL compatible.

pradhumanjain2311 → made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

Added documentation to resolve #5

Description added by @mfb reads well.

Rebased to check if this fails the new performance asset size coverage and it does - we're sending less bytes because the license information is included in the CSS aggregates, and it's now shorter - just needs the assertions updating.

Tests are passing

Thanks!

Committed/pushed to 11.x, thanks!

This doesn't cherry-pick cleanly to 10.3.x so will need a backport MR.

Backport ready for review

Backport looks good.

Committed e3da4cc and pushed to 10.3.x. Thanks!

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

mfb → closed merge request !7397

mfb → closed merge request !7298