SDC: Check renderable arrays when determining visibility

Created on 5 March 2024, 8 months ago

Problem/Motivation

There is a huge Drupal core issue about evaluating a render array as true or false from a Twig template: 🌱 [meta] Themes improperly check renderable arrays when determining visibility Needs work

Very annoying but, after 13 years, still no fix. But I hope it may be fixable at SDC level.

Steps to reproduce

Let's do some tests on Drupal 10.1.1 with this variable:

{% if description %}<p class="fr-tile__desc">{{ description }}</p>{% endif %}

We expect description to be resolved at false.

Test 1: empty array

$variables['description'] = [];

OK: description is false, because in PHP an empty array is false

Test 2: non renderable properties

$variables['description'] = [
  "#cache" => [
    "contexts" => [
      "user.permissions"
    ],
    "tags" => [],
    "max-age" => -1
  ]
]

KO: description is true

Test 3: non renderable properties wrapped in a sequence

$variables['description'] = [
 [
  "#cache" => [
    "contexts" => [
      "user.permissions"
    ],
    "tags" => [],
    "max-age" => -1
  ]
]
]

KO: description is true

Test 4: non renderable properties wrapped in a mapping

Layout Builder is sometimes wrapping the render array in a mapping where the key is the block UUID:

$variables['description'] = [
"cf124739-3274-41cc-829d-c3465ee4eaa5" => [
  "#cache" => [
    "contexts" => [
      "user.permissions"
    ],
    "tags" => [],
    "max-age" => -1
  ]
]
]

KO: description is true.

Test 5: empty mapping

$variables['description'] = [
    "whatever" => []
];

KO: description is true.

Test 6: empty #markup

 $variables['description'] =  [
    "#markup" => "",
  ];

KO: description is true.

Same with #plain_text I guess...

Proposed resolution

So, it may be fixable at SDC level because:

  • we know which Twig variables are expecting a render array : the slots as defined in the component definition
  • we know where to put the bubbled properties: the component render array ([#type => 'component'])

So, in ComponentElement::preRenderComponent() for each component slot, we need to:

  1. for each layer of nested arrays where there is no values and/or only non-printable property (#cache, #attached... what else?), bubble the property into component render element
  2. remove array with empty values with \Drupal\Component\Utility\NestedArray::filter($slot);

So, the renderable will be evaluated to false by Twig if empty πŸ‘

πŸ› Bug report
Status

Active

Version

11.0 πŸ”₯

Component
single-directory componentsΒ  β†’

Last updated 17 minutes ago

Created by

πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @pdureau
  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris
  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris
  • e0ipso Can Picafort

    One of the challenges I see with this is that we will have to identify and manually handle all these non-printable keys. This includes bubbling, and or erasing some keys.

    I would love to have this feature, but I am not sure a solid / maintainable implementation is feasible. Let's see what an initial patch looks like.

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States xjm
  • Status changed to Postponed: needs info about 2 months ago
  • πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium wim leers Ghent πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

    I hope it may be fixable at SDC level.

    I don't see how, because SDCs' slots may contain arbitrary contents, including arbitrary render arrays, so all the problems outlined in 🌱 [meta] Themes improperly check renderable arrays when determining visibility Needs work also apply here? πŸ€”

    The 6 tests in the issue summary are all simple cases. Introduce more complex render arrays using #lazy_builder anywhere (top level or deeply nested) in a render array for a slot, and it won't work anymore.

  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris

    One of the challenges I see with this is that we will have to identify and manually handle all these non-printable keys. This includes bubbling, and or erasing some keys.

    We need to try :) Maybe a predefined list of properties to bubble (#cache, #attached...) would be enough, maybe its is too naive.

    I don't see how, because SDCs' slots may contain arbitrary contents, including arbitrary render arrays

    Slots may contains:

    • scalars, which are transformed to [ "#plain_text" => (string) $slot_value ] before landing in the template
    • in a template, slot values are not expected to be "browsed" or altered, butprinted (in a Twig print node, with {{ ... }}:
      • PHP object implementing RenderableInterface are transformed to render arrays
      • render arrays are sent to the renderer service<
      • Stringable PHP objects are cast as strings
      • strings are simply printed

    So, the only blind spots, the only things not expected in a slot, are:

    • object not Stringable & not RenderableInterface, because they will raise 'Object of type ' . get_class($arg) . ' cannot be printed.'
    • arrays which are not render arrays, because they will raise InvalidArgumentException: "pop" is an invalid render array key.

    So, we know that all PHP arrays which are expected, which are legitimate, to be sent in a slot are Drupal render arrays. It is not our own decision, it is the current state of Drupal rendering. If we decide one day to remove this restriction, we will meet an other at the Twig level anyway: Warning: Array to string conversion.

    Knowing this, we can inspect and alter all slots PHP arrays as if they are render arrays, and apply to them our logic of bubbling some render properties and removing others.

    So all the problems outlined in #953034: [meta] Themes improperly check renderable arrays when determining visibility also apply here? πŸ€”

    This issue is not pretending to fix 🌱 [meta] Themes improperly check renderable arrays when determining visibility Needs work everywhere, but only for SDC. As SDC will become more and more successful, this issue will be more and more helpful :)

    The 6 tests in the issue summary are all simple cases. Introduce more complex render arrays using #lazy_builder anywhere (top level or deeply nested) in a render array for a slot, and it won't work anymore.

    Indeed. Thanks you for sharing that. We will be careful.

  • πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium wim leers Ghent πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

    I think it's worth starting with a single (simple) #lazy_builder example. I'm pretty confident you'll find that is immediately a hard blocker.

    Something like:

    $slot_content = [
      '#lazy_builder' => ['_what_time_is_it', []],
      '#create_placeholder' => TRUE,
    ];
    

    Assign πŸ‘† to a slot, and define:

    function _what_time_is_it() {
      $time = time();
      $reply = $time % 3600 === 0
        // Rudely no reply if it is exactly the top of the hour!
        ? ''
        // A polite reply otherwise.
        : '<marquee>It is ' . time() . '!</marquee>';
      return [
        '#markup' => $reply,
        '#cache' => [
          'max-age' => 0,
        ],
      ];
    }
    

    I don't see how you can make that work reliably. It's the exact same problem as 🌱 [meta] Themes improperly check renderable arrays when determining visibility Needs work has. And yes, it's a silly example, but replace that silliness with access checking. That is a very real use case that must also work.

  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris

    Thanks Wim.

    Indeed, a #lazy_builder renderable can be found in a slot (and only in a slot) and we don't want to execute the callback in order to get and evaluate the "real" renderable.

    The #lazy_builder renderable contains keys which don't belong to the non-printable keys we can remove or move to the #type => component level, so it will not be altered.

    So, we may have some false negative and miss some empty render arrays here. But I guess it is OK. If we catch the other ones, it is already a win.

    Do you agree?

  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris
  • πŸ‡«πŸ‡·France pdureau Paris
  • πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§United Kingdom catch

    If we catch the other ones, it is already a win.

    Can you explain what the win is here?

Production build 0.71.5 2024