- Issue created by @phenaproxima
- First commit to issue fork.
- 🇮🇳India narendraR Jaipur, India
narendraR → changed the visibility of the branch 3423526-pp-1-validate-that to hidden.
- 🇮🇳India narendraR Jaipur, India
There are basically 2 things which needs to be validated.
-
config:actions
config: actions: config_test.dynamic.recipe: ensure_exists: label: 'Created by recipe' setProtectedProperty: 'Set by recipe'
config_test should be either already present or is defined in recipes. And I think if action start with core, we don't have to do anything. eg in case of
core.entity_form_display.node.article.default
-
config:import
config: import: config_test: '*'
config_test should be either already present or is defined in recipes.
Not sure if this issue should handle both as suggested in MR comment, added IS update tag for that.
-
config:actions
- 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
Filled out the issue summary with some more info. Hopefully that's helpful!
- Status changed to Active
10 months ago 9:16am 4 March 2024 - First commit to issue fork.
- 🇮🇳India srishtiiee
srishtiiee → changed the visibility of the branch 3423526-validate_config_actions_entities to hidden.
- 🇮🇳India srishtiiee
srishtiiee → changed the visibility of the branch validate_config_actions to hidden.
- 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
AFAICT this could have prevented #3427118: Config error when a module installs a text format → 😄 @srishtiiee, can you confirm? 😊🙏
- Status changed to Needs review
10 months ago 7:21am 14 March 2024 - 🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺
The logic looks great! 🤩 Zero remarks 👍
My only concern: we're not explicitly testing all of the code paths we're adding. I'd feel more comfortable RTBC'ing this if all the scenarios I listed on the MR would be tested.
- Status changed to Needs work
10 months ago 1:08pm 14 March 2024 - 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
This is a great start, and I think the logic is sound, but the code could use some tightening up. :)
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 4:18am 20 March 2024 - 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
I think this looks pretty good and tests what it needs to. Since I did some refactoring (nothing major - the core logic is intact but I tried to clarify what we're doing here), I think it's back to Wim for final review.
- Status changed to RTBC
9 months ago 5:11pm 2 April 2024 - 🇺🇸United States phenaproxima Massachusetts
It's been nearly two weeks, and no movement here. I think it's okay for Alex to review this.
- Status changed to Fixed
9 months ago 11:35pm 4 April 2024 - 🇬🇧United Kingdom alexpott 🇪🇺🌍
Committed and pushed 2d6152b4e59 to 11.x and a55df2173d4 to 10.3.x. Thanks!
-
alexpott →
committed 2d6152b4 on 11.x
Issue #3423526 by srishtiiee, phenaproxima, narendraR, Wim Leers:...
-
alexpott →
committed 2d6152b4 on 11.x
-
alexpott →
committed a55df217 on 10.3.x
Issue #3423526 by srishtiiee, phenaproxima, narendraR, Wim Leers:...
-
alexpott →
committed a55df217 on 10.3.x
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.