- Issue created by @hudri
- 🇷🇺Russia ChiMany other Twig Tweak filters are also not filters. And Drupal core has such examples as well. Furthermore Twig itself has filters that don't filter anything. That's a historical naming convention that we can't change. 
- 🇦🇹Austria hudri AustriaThe "filter" phrase was meant in regard to the current description (the opposite of core's without), which actually does filter a render array. I can't see any the reason whywith(setter) should be the opposite ofwithout(filter)
- 🇷🇺Russia ChiI can't see the reason why with (setter) should be the opposite of without (filter) withoutremoves properties
 withadds properties
 Isn't this what "opposite" term means?
- 🇦🇹Austria hudri AustriaOK, now I got the naming. In my mental model, withoutis a filter by disallow list, so reading the description I thoughtwithis a filter by safe list, and used it likecontent|with(computedArrayOfAllowedFieldnames). This did not work and let to the creation of this issue.
- last updatealmost 2 years ago 11 pass
- @hudri opened merge request.
- Status changed to Needs reviewalmost 2 years ago 9:30am 7 November 2023
- Status changed to RTBCalmost 2 years ago 6:54am 10 November 2023
- 🇮🇳India shyam_bhatt Gujarat@hudri I have checked the "MR !39", documentation updated on the "cheat-sheet.md" file. Before: 
 After: 
 + Moving to RTBC 
- Status changed to Fixedalmost 2 years ago 7:23am 10 November 2023
- 🇷🇺Russia Chi@Shyam_Bhatt no need to make screenshots for code. It only proves that you are correctly deployed the Git branch to your localhost. The change is visible here. 
 https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/twig_tweak-3399652/-/blob/3399652-with-...
- Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.