- Issue created by @e0ipso
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 9:23am 30 October 2023 - Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 6:21am 31 October 2023 - e0ipso Can Picafort
I think this one is a bit too busy. I think it may look confusing in lower sizes.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 10:02am 31 October 2023 - 🇮🇪Ireland lostcarpark
I don't think there is an official JSON RPC logo, but it might be worth trying to incorporate the JSON logo.
(From Wikimedia.
- 🇮🇳India urvashi_vora Madhya Pradesh, India
Hi @lostcarpark,
I have tried to create a few variations using the image provided for json.
Please review.
- Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 8:31am 18 November 2023 - 🇮🇳India urvashi_vora Madhya Pradesh, India
Can you suggest a few changes @lostcarpark?
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 4:03pm 18 November 2023 - 🇮🇪Ireland lostcarpark
Sorry, my mistake, I posted a comment suggesting including the JSON logo last night, then this morning I realised I should have set to needs work, but I didn't notice you'd commented in the meantime.
I like all 3 of those. I think 3 is probably my preference.
My only slight reservation is I don't think there's anything specifically suggesting a RPC (remote procedure call) connection. However, I can't think of a good way of indicating the RPC except maybe something like an arrow to a cloud, but I think that could just make it look cluttered without adding any clarity.
So I'd be happy with json-rpc-logo-3.png form #6, but I'd like to see if others agree or have other suggestions.
Setting back to needs review.
- Status changed to RTBC
about 1 year ago 10:17am 20 November 2023