Secure open source licensing for fonts used in the Drupal brand

Created on 20 October 2023, about 1 year ago
Updated 17 July 2024, 4 months ago

The new Drupal Brand Guidelines propose the use of two fonts:
https://drupal.widencollective.com/portals/gfvztttq/BrandPortal

We should ensure they are both open source fonts.

  • Noto Sans - License: OFL
  • ZT_Gatha - License: - now rights and ownership purchased in full and donated to the Drupal Association. We will likely choose OFL for the license.

Next steps

  • Decide on License
  • Decide how to publish/distribute
  • Check things like glyph support for i18n for multilingual usecases
πŸ“Œ Task
Status

Needs work

Component

User interface

Created by

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Canada pixelite Montreal

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @pixelite
  • πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§United Kingdom james.h

    The new Drupal brand looks great, however, here are some refinements I propose:

    The typeface ZT Gatha doesn’t appear to be under an open-source licence. Instead, it appears to use a licence on 1001fonts.com which is free for commercial use, but only includes two font weights (bold and semi bold). Other font foundries offer less ZT Gatha font weights for free, providing only Semi Bold for free (this includes the author of the font, Zelow Type). The four weights which are shown in the Drupal re-brand deck wouldn’t be available for use without purchasing a paid-for font licence.

    A secondary typeface for body copy would benefit the design system, especially if the selected typeface has wide language support. Certain fonts available online under the Open Font Licence include support for almost every writing system in use throughout the world. This would support the Drupal brand worldwide. An example of this would be IKEA using the β€˜Noto’ type family: https://fonts.google.com/noto.

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States mayankguptadotcom Charlotte

    @pixelite - will it be possible to share the rebrand deck link to be able to share the feedback or review it please.

  • πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Canada Kushneet

    Attended bi-weekly check-in on 30 November 2023 to discuss feedback for the new Drupal brand

  • πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Canada rgladden

    Attended 20/11 call

  • Status changed to Closed: outdated 6 months ago
  • Assigned to hestenet
  • Status changed to Needs work 4 months ago
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States hestenet Portland, OR πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

    Repurposing this issue for the ZT Gatha font licensing question - as the rest of the font feedback and implementation is covered by #3447679: [META] Apply the new brand to Drupal.org β†’

    Some good news on this front!

    The full rights and ownership of ZT_Gatha have been purchased from its creator Zelow Type and it is being donated to the Drupal Association. @Shawn Perritt at Acquia took care of this, and we thank them for the purchase/donation!

    This means we own the full rights and can re-license and redistribute it however we choose.

    My inclination is to suggest we release under OFL - but I'm open to feedback and suggestions.

    Setting to 'Needs work' while we decide on the license and where/how we need to document that

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States hestenet Portland, OR πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Production build 0.71.5 2024