- Issue created by @dead_arm
- Assigned to Sahana _N
- Issue was unassigned.
- Assigned to Sahana _N
- 🇪🇸Spain penyaskito Seville 💃, Spain 🇪🇸, UTC+2 🇪🇺
@Sahana_N We want to use views if possible. Thanks for planning to work on this!
- 🇳🇱Netherlands ifrik
@sahana_n are you currently working on it? Otherwise I pick this up in the contribution sprint
- 🇮🇳India Sahana _N
@ifrik
I started working on this today or tomorrow it will be completed.
Thank you!!! - 🇳🇱Netherlands ifrik
It's probably easier to discuss this directly at the Contrtibution sprint today, but it put it here as well:
We should provide this block in the same view that provides a block for the latest content of an user. They are very similar and it means less views provided by default.
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 8:46am 20 October 2023 - 🇳🇱Netherlands ifrik
We just discussed this at the contribution sprint and decided to provide this and other content blocks for the Content Management dashboard by one view instead of by several.
Unfortunately this comment didn't get posted for some reason.
- 🇳🇱Netherlands ifrik
Hi @sahana_n,
sorry that I didn't realize that my comment didn't get posted in time, and we ended up with double work.
I've already added this block in another view 📌 Provide content blocks in one view Needs reviewI also had a look at your patch and it looks like you've over-complicated things. In Views you can now use "Content revision: Revision user" as contextual filter to filter for the UID that edited a node.
- 🇪🇸Spain penyaskito Seville 💃, Spain 🇪🇸, UTC+2 🇪🇺
Closing this in favor of 📌 Provide content blocks in one view Needs review . I've moved credit there.
- Status changed to Closed: duplicate
9 months ago 11:37am 16 April 2024