- Issue created by @kopeboy
- 🇷🇺Russia Chi
I think integer It was not a very lucky choice. Having something like "HH:MM:SS" would allow use native database types for storing the time.
Field Time → module implements it this way.
Wouldn't it be more efficient to either:
??
Active
2.0
Documentation
I think integer It was not a very lucky choice. Having something like "HH:MM:SS" would allow use native database types for storing the time.
Field Time → module implements it this way.