- Issue created by @galileo25
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 2:58pm 25 April 2023 - last update
over 1 year ago 130 pass - last update
over 1 year ago 130 pass - last update
over 1 year ago 29 pass, 14 fail The last submitted patch, 5: ckeditor5_textarea_as_source-3356304-5.patch, failed testing. View results →
- codesniffer_fixes.patch Interdiff of automated coding standards fixes only.- Status changed to Needs work
5 months ago 2:17pm 31 July 2024 - Status changed to Postponed: needs info
4 months ago 9:04am 30 August 2024 - 🇫🇷France dqd London | N.Y.C | Paris | Hamburg | Berlin
This issue report is very confusing. In the first lines it says "Module doesn't works for the source fields with CKEditor5 added" which is actually already confusing on its own, but then in the last lines it even says more confusing "It's works only for textarea but doesn't work for textfield. We can't make textfield required by changing textarea." which is the opposite of what the title of the issue says. Apart from the wrong English grammar phrasing (no offense) it is also technically impossible to follow. And I do not understand the proposed solution.
Can somebody please rewrite/update the issue summary, so that all users and contributors understand what this is issue is exactly about? I would love to support the issue to get fixed and committed soon as a maintainer but I seriously worry that there are different interpretations around what this issue tries to solve.
And #5 is not a follow up patch of #4 and the comment in #5 does not clarify what this patch exactly is for.