- Issue created by @joachim
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
These are the ones which I think are testing the form:
content_translation/tests/src/Functional/ContentTranslationEnableTest.php
content_translation/tests/src/Functional/ContentTranslationDisableSettingTest.php
content_translation/tests/src/Functional/ContentTranslationUISkipTest.php
content_translation/tests/src/Functional/ContentTranslationSettingsTest.phpI note in passing that there appears to be no coverage in language module of the ContentLanguageSettingsForm *without* content_translation's form alterations. Is that something that should be fixed as side issue?
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
Tests that run the form in a test method rather than setUp():
- ContactLanguageTest - has no business testing this form, it doesn't belong to this module!
- ModerationFormTest - same
- ContentTranslationContextualLinksTest - says it's using the form 'This tests that caches are properly invalidated' but that surely belongs in a test with a more accurate name.
- ContentTranslationOperationsTest - needs fixing
- ContentTranslationStandardFieldsTest - not sure. The code makes it look like it's checking the standard profile is correctly set up for translation. But the docblock 'Tests that translatable fields are being rendered' suggests it's testing the form. But if that's the case, it shouldn't use the expensive to install standard profile, but test modules instead.
- ContentTranslationSyncImageTest - says " Check that the content translation settings page reflects the changes performed in the field edit page." - but weird place to do that in. Future refactor?
- ContentTranslationUntranslatableFieldsTest - fix
- EntityReferenceFieldTranslatedReferenceViewTest - fix
- ImageOnTranslatedEntityTest - fix
- LanguageConfigSchemaTest - fix
- MenuUiNodeTest - fix. Test comment says 'Use a UI form submission to make the node type and menu link content entity translatable.' but that's just silly.
- NodeTranslationUITest - fix
- PathContentModerationTest - fix
- PathLanguageTest - fix
- SearchMultilingualTest - fix
- DisplayFeedTranslationTest - fix
- PathWorkspacesTest - fix - 🇺🇸United States dww
Love this, thanks for getting it going! Hope to have time to help sometime "soon".
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 8:35pm 21 August 2023 - Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 9:52pm 21 August 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Think could be added too
PrivateFileOnTranslatedEntityTest
FileOnTranslatedEntityTest - Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 9:23am 22 August 2023 - 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
Thanks!
Updated the IS to add the analysis so far, to make reviewing easier. - Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 5:44pm 26 August 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
So I believe the list you got is good.
Now that is a lot so not sure if breaking it up would be quicker in the long run.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 4:35pm 27 August 2023 - 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
Made a MR which adds @covers tags to the tests which are actually testing the form.
Once this is merged, we can file follow-on issues to convert all the other tests which use this form to use API calls instead.
- last update
about 1 year ago Custom Commands Failed - @joachim opened merge request.
- last update
about 1 year ago 30,060 pass - Status changed to RTBC
about 1 year ago 8:57pm 27 August 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Tests all green so the @covers seem good.
Tagging for followup after merged.
- last update
about 1 year ago 30,063 pass - last update
about 1 year ago 30,130 pass - 🇺🇸United States mile23 Seattle, WA
+1 on baby steps to annotate these tests, and then follow through with converting other tests to use API calls in other issues.
My one very minor gripe is that
@covers
has a specific meaning for PHPUnit, such that all the coverage in a coverage report for that test will be filtered so it only contains that class or function. So this is a little bit of an abuse of the annotation, but is also completely reasonable for this process.Some of these tests could likely be converted to KTB, but that's another meta for another day.
Very curious how the determination was made per test... Is there some magical regex or other methodology to generate a list like this? We could apply it to other settings forms, in order to find places to convert form-fill actions to API calls.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
> Some of these tests could likely be converted to KTB, but that's another meta for another day.
I've got my eye on that sort of thing too! Functional tests which just check the page content for a simple string could be done as kernel tests. But we need a way to write the responses to HTML files for debugging and development.
> Very curious how the determination was made per test... Is there some magical regex or other methodology to generate a list like this?
I just did a search for drupalGet('PATH') in all files whose name matches '/Functional/'.
I don't think I managed to find a way to refine it to look specifically in the setUp() method. But that is a good heuristic - we could potentially teach it to DrupalRector. It's not comprehensive though - lots of tests to setup-ish things in their test methods.
- Status changed to Fixed
about 1 year ago 6:11am 1 September 2023 - Assigned to joachim
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim
I'm working my way down the list filing issues for the tests to fix.
- 🇺🇸United States mile23 Seattle, WA
Setting this issue to be a child of the meta.
- Issue was unassigned.
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.