Is history module really needed as dependency? Why?
If not, we should remove it.
Seems to be used in the view config/install/views.view.drowl_admin_dashboard_content.yml:
https://git.drupalcode.org/search?search=history&nav_source=navbar&proje...
for the timestamp field:
timestamp:
id: timestamp
table: history
field: timestamp
relationship: none
group_type: group
admin_label: ''
plugin_id: history_user_timestamp
label: ''
exclude: false
alter:
alter_text: false
text: ''
make_link: false
path: ''
absolute: false
external: false
replace_spaces: false
path_case: none
trim_whitespace: false
alt: ''
rel: ''
link_class: ''
prefix: ''
suffix: ''
target: ''
nl2br: false
max_length: 0
word_boundary: true
ellipsis: true
more_link: false
more_link_text: ''
more_link_path: ''
strip_tags: false
trim: false
preserve_tags: ''
html: false
element_type: ''
element_class: ''
element_label_type: ''
element_label_class: ''
element_label_colon: false
element_wrapper_type: ''
element_wrapper_class: ''
element_default_classes: true
empty: ''
hide_empty: false
empty_zero: false
hide_alter_empty: true
link_to_node: false
comments: false
Postponed
2.0
Code
It's the "new" marker in the content view. We should decide, if it's worth and needed or if we should remove it for performance reasons.
As it's also used in the default "content" view, it wouldn't change much. We still shouldn't remove the history module, as it seems. So let's postpone this for a future discussion.