- Issue created by @økse
- 🇧🇪Belgium økse
I did debug this a bit further.
It looks like the difference in sub formatter within the Pattern (one for all) field formatter doesn't matter because the Pattern (one for all) field formatter doesn't make use of any configured sub formatter.
Ideally this functionally could be integrated.
- Status changed to Postponed: needs info
over 1 year ago 9:57am 6 June 2023 - 🇫🇷France duaelfr Montpellier, France
Hi!
I don't know where your issue comes from. This is supposed to be working.
In 2.x if you want your formatted values to be used, you have to set their pattern field to anything else than "- Hidden -". The only reason you could have the behavior you describe is if you didn't.
If your "Formatted values" source is already mapped to a pattern field then we have a real problem!